Is 2015 a change election? I am sometimes the downer of
my friends and colleagues by pointing out the fact that even though we and many
people we know do not like Prime Minister Stephen Harper there is a very strong
chance that he may be re-elected. To progressives and those who have carefully
watched the mismanagement of the previous years, or tuned into the Duffy trial
the writing seems to be on the wall.
In Canadian tradition it is unusual for a political
leader to last more than ten years. If re-elected Prime Minister Harper will
have been in power 10 years in January 2016. After ten years a growing number
of Canadians will be growing tired of Mr. Harper and interested in looking for
alternatives. Part of the reason that governments/leaders tend not to last
longer than ten years is that scandals and controversies pile up around them
and drain them of public support. Jean Charest in Quebec, Dalton McGuinty in
Ontario and Brian Mulroney federally are all excellent examples of leader taken
down by years of baggage.
However, there usually is a straw that breaks the camel's
back. For McGuinty it was the gas plants; a nagging political issue that
threatened to destroy his government that was in a precarious minority. The
Harper Conservatives have been in trouble before. Before the 2011 election
Parliament censured them for disrespect for parliament. Sadly Canadians are
worried more about financial transgressions than democratic ones. Even still,
Tony Clement (CPC - Parry Sound-Muskoka, ON) misspent millions of dollars for
cosmetic upgrades to his riding and he was re-elected easily, as were the
Conservatives. It's always shockingly strange when something like Bev Oda, a
former minister, nearly brings down the government with $16 orange juices when
Clement can be forgiven his callous misuse of public funds.
Critics of the Conservatives can (and do) make lists of abuses under Prime Minister Harper and provide amble evidence why it is in the
best interest of the country to replace him. But that is not the average voter. Voters, generally speaking, don't care about
omnibus bills or respect for parliament (to my great and profound sadness).
What might stick is fraud. If any one thing might end the premiership of
Stephen Harper it is the trial of Senator Mike Duffy. Remember that politics is
about perceptions and not realities. Even if Stephen Harper cannot be directly
tied to any of the allegations, just like the $16 orange juice it will create a
narrative. Trials are smoke and smoke mans fire.
But any fantasy that the Conservatives will be routed
from power needs to be tempered with the simple fact that the electorate is
strongly divided. The Conservative vote is very efficient. Rural ridings across
the country and certain Western ridings will stick with them even if they drop
below 30%. Even below 30% they will likely win about 100 seats. Meanwhile their
opponents, the New Democrats, Liberals and Greens are all scrapping for many of
the same voters in the same places. Take for example my hometown, Brampton. In
2011 the Conservatives won all of the seats here, but Brampton, like much of
the 905, used to be solid Liberal territory. Even at their peak the
Conservatives only narrowly beat their Liberals opponents in some ridings. In
2011 the NDP made a breakthrough in eastern Brampton. In the 2014 provincial
election that strength was reaffirmed and spread westward. It's possible that
2015 will see three-way races across the city which might result in smaller
margins of victory and Conservatives winning despite declining popularity.
As stated before, the electorate is divided. There are a
great deal who ready to dump the Conservatives and try something new, but there
is probably about 20-25% of the population who will be voting CPC no matter
what. If this is a change election the opposition parties are going to have to
work very hard on the ground to prove it.
No comments:
Post a Comment