In the wake of the
election the defeated parties are forced into moments of introspection and
scrutiny. The reaction can be predictable. Some group within the party who felt
maligned and pushed out by the current leadership will declare that they are
right all along. "If only they had listened to us!" And then there
are those who will instead blame the public for not embracing the party of
their choice. The NDP is currently in this position and is questioning its
future, its ideology and its leader.
Since the leadership of
Jack Layton the NDP has moved towards the centre of the political spectrum.
Following the tremendous electoral gains and death of Jack Layton the NDP was
left with a political conundrum, would they press forward to try to win power
or remain the conscience of the parliament? The battle for the future of the
party was embodied in the leadership contest.
In the final, fourth
ballot Tom Mulcair defeated Brian Topp 57.2% to 42.8%. But looking at the
candidates who ran it is clear that most hailed from the centre-left, not the
hard left. In 2011 the NDP was in a different position and ready to be the
government-in-waiting. The moderation of the NDP federally was not an aberration.
The federal party in many ways was mirroring what its successful peers
provincially had done across the country.
Despite many successes and
solid poll numbers under Tom Mulcair's leadership the election slipped through
the NDP's fingers. I haven't written about this on this blog but the NDP did
not lose the election because of Tom Mulcair. I think he had troubles in his
first election as leader, but he was building real support across the country.
Ultimately it might be the flawed appeal to Quebec that sunk the NDP. I think
the campaign assumed Quebec would be in the bank and no part of the platform
appealed to voters in that province. One of the most prominent parts of the
platform, $15/day daycare, was superfluous in Quebec given that they have
$7/day daycare. Then factor in the niqab debate and NDP's hopes for the
province eroded dramatically. As the national numbers declined anti-Harper
voters fled to the Liberals.
Mulcair holds responsibility
for the election, but should he resign as leader?
This isn't a simple yes/no
question. If you believe Mulcair should stay on then fine, but if you believe
he should leave then you have to suggest an alternative leader. Despite the
beating the NDP experienced in 2015 it has a strong presence in Quebec. Who do
you propose who can speak French fluently to lead the NDP? Will the left-wing
of the party call in Brian Topp to lead them? He currently works in Premier
Rachel Notley's office, not as an elected politician. Can the Trudeau Liberals
continue to hold onto their gains in Quebec? If the NDP are not there as an
active opposition they may revert back to the Bloc.
Surveying the NDP
landscape I have a hard time seeing a better candidate to lead the party than
Tom Mulcair. He is fluent in French and English, a tremendous performer in the
House of Commons, and with real political experience. The real problem is the
political position of the NDP. The Liberals were able to capitalize on a
popular leader and collapsing Conservative support. The NDP should probably
move back to the left slightly to hold the Liberals to account, but frankly
they have moved to the left themselves on many issues. Holding the Liberals to
their promises should be enough to drive up NDP support, but without a
credible, effective leader these benefits will accrue to the Conservatives.
Party members will have a chance to express themselves this April in Edmonton.
Hopefully they have the ability to look past their anger and ideology and make
the right choice.
1 comment:
Thank you, Jared. Our political system rewards moderation, for obvious reasons. I wonder if our professional civil service also doesn't play a part in that as well.
Post a Comment