In The End of the
Suburbs: Where the American Dream is Moving by Leigh Gallagher makes the
argument that the suburban mode of development reached its peak in the 1990s
and 2000s and we it has begun its decline as the monolithic form of the built
environment. As Gallagher makes clear in her conclusion, the suburbs aren't
really over. With millions of homes built in the suburban style and millions of
Americans still enamoured with the vision of a big house on a piece of land it
will likely always remain. However, the author argues, alternative modes of
living are becoming more dominant and reflect a sea change.
Many of the economic and social factors that created the
suburbs are in decline or in reverse. It's probably fair to say that we are in
the third (maybe fourth?) generation of
the suburbs. The logic that created the first few versions of the suburbs have
broken down. The initial suburbs were directly alongside the central city. The
inner ring of suburbs that developed next were often serviced with public
transit and were dense and walkable. However for the second, third, and fourth
generation of suburbs prospective homebuyers were driven further into former
agricultural areas along freeways. It seems though that the suburban experiment
in the 1990s began to reach a point of diminishing returns. Commutes got longer
and longer and prices kept climbing. Gallagher writes that many point to the
mortgage crisis and high gas prices for killing suburbs, but the truth is that
urban property values began to climb again (after decades of decline) in the
1980s.
The cars that promised liberty were transforming into
prisons as millions of North Americans trapped themselves for hours a day
grinding their ways between work and home. The demographic explosion that
justified the suburbs, the Baby Boom, is much diminished. Birth rates have
cratered. There is far less need for properties for kids to play in with many
bedrooms when fewer people are coupling and having children.
The End of the
Suburbs reads like a very long article as it is written in an accessible,
casual way, which makes sense given that the author is a journalist. The author
conducts interviews that demonstrate many of the failings of suburban life, and
contrasts them with people proposing, building or living alternatives. A number
of big developers appear in the book, which gives a clear example of how the
market is transforming on the demand and supply sides.
There is a slim undercurrent in the book that suggests
what is emerging is suburban-like cities and city-like suburbs. I had similar
thinking looking at some of the 'new hip' neighbourhoods of Toronto, like
Liberty Village. All the chains and wealth of the suburbs have been poured into
condominiums and boutiques offering faux-authentic brick even though it's the
same chain from the strip mall in the 'burbs.
I think Gallagher does a convincing job laying out the
case that the unending sprawl is going to slow down, if not come to an end. But,
what will take its place isn't the past but some hybrid of urban and suburban
living. I would recommend this book for anyone interested in the future of the
suburbs and the housing market. It is entirely accessible to a lay audience but
sophisticated enough for people well versed in the subject.
1 comment:
Thanks for your feedback Jared. I would be extremely curious what you would make of this book if you read it. The author grew up in Suburbia and appreciates the appeal. Her concluding chapter ties the ideas of suburbia with current trends well.
I myself grew up in and currently live in a suburb. I think one of the issues is the diminishing returns and structural problems with low-density sprawl. Alternatives to sprawl aren't just high rises in the inner city, look at old medium and small cities. I think it is about a built environment more consistent with its population.
Post a Comment