On the lead up to the
federal election there were a number of controversies over the selection of
local candidates. It was easy to be critical of Trudeau and the central party
rather than the candidates in these conflicts. The Edge in Yellowknife gives
details on a controversy over the Liberal nomination in the Northwest Territories.
I've seen this argument
made numerous times before. From the Bramptonist, the election of five Liberal
MPs means Brampton is poised to get special attention from the federal
government. I entirely disagree. It suggests that the government runs solely on a crass
quid pro quo model and is tantamount to corruption.
Hurontario-Main LRT
advocates seem obsessed with the loss at Council, which has been frustrating for
me. I like this piece from Fight Gridlock, a local organization, who suggests
what supporters of the HMLRT should concentrate on next.
On a related note,
Brampton Council voted to have staff come up with alternatives to the HMLRT. It's a frustrating position, I imagine, for city staff who already backed the
Metrolinx proposal.
Martin Regg Cohn gives his
take on the opaque and foolish decision by the Ontario government to sell off Hydro One.
The Globe and Mail
suggests that John Tory's proposed Smart Tracks plan has a major financial
shortfall and that the 'Western Spur' may cost as much as $5 billion.
In the wake of the tragic
attacks in Paris there was an explosion on social media of professed support. My
skepticism tends to put me in the camp that this was largely fueled by
self-indulgence, self-importance and social pressure and little to do with the
tragedy. This piece from The Atlantic offers a more positive interpretation.
Andrew Potter takes a look
at the Harper legacy and how while some parts are easily overturned by Trudeau
the federal government has lost substantial power vis-a-vis the provinces.
Finally, this piece from
the New Yorker questions if polls are hurting democracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment